Summary

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton United States v. City of New Britain…

A Connecticut statute provides that real-estate tax liens 'shall take precedence of all transfers and incumbrances' in any manner affecting the property subject to the line. [5] Another state law gives the water-rent liens 'precedence over all other liens or incumbrances except taxes' on the property subject to the liens. [6] The funds available for distribution being insufficient to pay all claimants in full, the Superior Court directed that the expenses, the City's liens, the mortgages, the judgment lien, and the United States' liens be paid in that order.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton United States v. City of New Britain…

The United States is not interested in whether the State receives its taxes and water rents prior to mortgagees and judgment creditors. That is a matter of state law. But as to any funds in excess of the amount necessary to pay the mortgage and judgment creditors, Congress intended to assert the federal lien. There is nothing in the language of § 3672 to show that Congress intended antecedent federal tax liens to rank behind any but the specific categories of interests set out therein, and the legislative history lends support to this impression.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton United States v. City of New Britain…

Thus, the general statutory liens of the United States are as binding as the specific statutory liens of the City. The City gains no priority by the fact that its liens are specific while the United States' liens are general. Obviously, the State cannot on behalf of the City impair the standing of the federal liens, without the consent of Congress.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature