Summary

Portrait of Smith Thompson Smith Thompson Lee v. Dick — Opinion of the Court

A guarantee is a mercantile instrument, and to be construed according to what is fairly to be presumed to have been the understanding of the parties, without any strict technical nicety. If the guarantee stood alone, unexplained by the letter which accompanied it, it would undoubtedly be limited to a specific draft for 2000 dollars, and would not cover that amount in a bill for a larger sum; but the letter which accompanied it fully justifies the conclusion, that the defendant undertook to guaranty 2000 dollars in a draft for a larger amount.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Smith Thompson Smith Thompson Lee v. Dick — Opinion of the Court

Reynolds and others, 7 Peters 125, was an action upon a guarantee; and the court was requested to instruct the jury, that to enable the plaintiff to recover on the letter of guarantee, they must prove that notice had been given, in a seasonable time after said letter of guarantee had been accepted by them, to the defendant, that the same had been accepted. This instruction the court below refused to give; and this court say the instruction asked was correct, and ought to have been given. That a party giving a letter of guarantee has a right to know whether it is accepted
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature