Summary

Portrait of Sonia Sotomayor Sonia Sotomayor Gamache v. California — Statement

After a jury convicted Richard Gamache of first-degree murder and sentenced him to death, Gamache's counsel and the trial court learned that during deliberations, court personnel inadvertently gave the jury a videotape that had not been admitted into evidence. During its deliberations, the jury watched the video twice in full and a third time in part before reaching its verdict.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sonia Sotomayor Sonia Sotomayor Gamache v. California — Statement

California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967) , the prosecution must carry the burden of showing that a constitutional trial error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See also Deck v. Missouri, 544 U.S. 622, 635 (2005) (" [W] here a court, without adequate justification, orders the defendant to wear shackles that will be seen by the jury... [t] he State must prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt that the [shackling] error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained'" (quoting Chapman, 386 U.S., at 24) )
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature