Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed United States v. Spelar — Opinion of the Court

Sufficient basis for our conclusion lies in the express words of the statute. We know of no more accurate phrase in common English usage than 'foreign country' to denote territory subject to the sovereignty of another nation. [5] By the exclusion of 'claims arising in a foreign country,' the coverage of the Federal Tort Claims Act was geared to the sovereignty of the United States.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed United States v. Spelar — Opinion of the Court

Spelar's administratrix, respondent here, initiated this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York, the district where she resides. She alleges that the fatal accident was caused by the Government's negligent operation of Harmon Field. The local law which underlies her cause of action is Newfoundland's wrongful death statute authorizing the executor or administrator to bring suit for death arising from negligence.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed United States v. Spelar — Opinion of the Court

In brief, though Congress was ready to lay aside a great portion of the sovereign's ancient and unquestioned immunity from suit, it was unwilling to subject the United States to liabilities depending upon the laws of a foreign power. The legislative will must be respected. The present suit, premised entirely upon Newfoundland's law, may not be asserted against the United States in contravention of that will.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature