Summary

Stanley Matthews McGinty v. Flannagan — Opinion of the Court

Even on the supposition that the partnership stock was held under an express and positive trust for partnership creditors, equity would give the latter only so much of the fund as represented the partnership property, and would divide it as to values between the parties beneficially interested, even although the specific goods might not be separable.
Source: Wikisource

Stanley Matthews McGinty v. Flannagan — Opinion of the Court

Edward McGinty, the plaintiff in error, having in that cause appeared as a claimant of the property seized under the attachment, the same was delivered to him by the marshal, on taking a bond conditioned to pay to the plaintiffs in the attachment such damages as might be awarded against the claimant in case his claim should not be sustained, or, in that event, to return the goods to the marshal.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature