Stephen Johnson Field,
Hurt v. Hollingsworth — Opinion of the Court
“ In the other case, if the defendant establishes his averments, the judgment must be for the possession of the premises and the rent and profits.In the Federal courts such a blending of equitable and legal causes of action in one suit is not permissible under the Process Act of 1792, substantially re-enacted in the Revised Statutes, which declares that in suits in equity, in the Circuit and District Courts of the United States, the forms and modes of proceeding shall be according to the principles, rules, and usages which belong to courts of equity. ”
