Supreme Court of the United States

“ We need not resolve either the viability of plaintiffs’ claims as a whole or whether plaintiffs should receive further leave to amend. Rather, we think it sufficient to acknowledge that much (if not all) of plaintiffs’ complaint seems to fail under either our decision in Twitter or the Ninth Circuit’s unchallenged holdings below. We therefore decline to address the application of §230 to a complaint that appears to state little, if any, plausible claim for relief. ”

“ In 2015, ISIS terrorists unleashed a set of coordinated attacks across Paris, France, killing 130 victims, including Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old U. S. citizen. [1] Gonzalez’s parents and brothers then sued Google, LLC, under 18 U. S. C. §§2333 (a) and (d) (2) , alleging that Google was both directly and secondarily liable for the terrorist attack that killed Gonzalez. ”