Summary

Portrait of Tertullian Tertullian Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. IV, Tertullian… (1885)

If “righteousness” must, of course chastity must too. If, then, forasmuch as there is in the law a precept that a man is to take in marriage the wife of his brother if he have died without children, [4] for the purpose of raising up seed to his brother; and this may happen repeatedly to the same person, according to that crafty question of the Sadducees; [5] men for that reason think that frequency of marriage is permitted in other cases as well: it will be their duty to understand first the reason of the precept itself
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tertullian Tertullian Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. IV, Tertullian… (1885)

And since there are some who sometimes assert that they have nothing to do with the law (which Christ has not dissolved, but fulfilled) , [1] sometimes catch at such parts of the law as they choose; plainly do we too assert that the law has deceased in this sense, that its burdens—according to the sentence of the apostles—which not even the fathers were able to sustain, [2] have wholly ceased: such (parts) , however, as relate to righteousness not only permanently remain reserved, but even amplified
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature