Summary

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 26 - OF THE PASSIONS OF THE SOUL IN PARTICULAR: AND FIRST, OF LOVE

The reason why some held that, even when applied to the will itself, the word "love" signifies something more Godlike than "dilection," was because love denotes a passion, especially in so far as it is in the sensitive appetite; whereas dilection presupposes the judgment of reason. But it is possible for man to tend to God by love, being as it were passively drawn by Him, more than he can possibly be drawn thereto by his reason, which pertains to the nature of dilection, as stated above.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 26 - OF THE PASSIONS OF THE SOUL IN PARTICULAR: AND FIRST, OF LOVE

It would seem that love is not a passion. For no power is a passion. But every love is a power, as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv) . Therefore love is not a passion.
Objection 2: Further, love is a kind of union or bond, as Augustine says (De Trin. viii, 10) . But a union or bond is not a passion, but rather a relation. Therefore love is not a passion.
Objection 3: Further, Damascene says (De Fide Orth. ii, 22) that passion is a movement. But love does not imply the movement of the appetite; for this is desire, of which movement love is the principle. Therefore love is not a passion.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature