Summary

Thurgood Marshall Cottage Savings Association v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Rather than assessing tax liability on the basis of annual fluctuations in the value of a taxpayer's property, the Internal Revenue Code defers the tax consequences of a gain or loss in property value until the taxpayer "realizes" the gain or loss. The realization requirement is implicit in § 1001 (a) of the Code, 26 U.S.C. § 1001 (a) , which defines " [t] he gain [or loss] from the sale or other disposition of property" as the difference between "the amount realized" from the sale or disposition of the property and its "adjusted basis."
Source: Wikisource

Thurgood Marshall Cottage Savings Association v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

We hold that such a transaction does give rise to realized losses.
* Petitioner Cottage Savings Association (Cottage Savings) is a savings and loan association (S & L) formerly regulated by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) . [1] Like many S & L's, Cottage Savings held numerous long-term, low-interest mortgages that declined in value when interest rates surged in the late 1970's. These institutions would have benefited from selling their devalued mortgages in order to realize tax-deductible losses.
Source: Wikisource

Thurgood Marshall Cottage Savings Association v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Moreover, the complexity of the Commissioner's approach ill serves the goal of administrative convenience that underlies the realization requirement. In order to apply the Commissioner's test in a principled fashion, the Commissioner and the taxpayer must identify the relevant market, establish whether there is a regulatory agency whose views should be taken into account, and then assess how the relevant market participants and the agency would view the transaction.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature