Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Reisman v. Caplin — Opinion of the Court

On the other hand, in tax enforcement proceedings the hearing officer has no power of enforcement or right to levy any sanctions. It is true that any person summoned who 'neglects to appear or to produce' may be prosecuted under § 7210 [5] and is subject to a fine not exceeding $1,000, or imprisonment for not more than a year, or both. However, this statute on its face does not apply where the witness appears and interposes good faith challenges to the summons. It only prescribes punishment where the witnesses 'neglects' either to appear or to produce.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Reisman v. Caplin — Opinion of the Court

We need not pass upon the coverage of this provision in light of the facts here. It is sufficient to say that noncompliance is not subject to prosecution thereunder when the summons is attacked in good faith. [6]
Petitioners also point to § 7604 (b) [7] as posing the risk of arrest should the Commissioner proceed under that section for an 'attachment * * * as for a contempt.' Arguably, such a sanction, even though temporary, might be a penalty severe enough to bring the section within the rationale of Young, supra, but we do not so read § 7604 (b) .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature