Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Henning — Opinion of the Court

We conclude that in this crisis legislation Congress, fully aware of the sometimes inevitable delays in payment, preferred the occasionally harsh result to a course of action which would permit funds intended for living members of the narrow statutory class of permissible takers to seep down to an enlarged class of sub-beneficiaries created not by the Act itself but by intended beneficiaries' testamentary plans. Courts may not flout so unmistakable a legislative purpose, expressed in so clear a congressional command.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Henning — Opinion of the Court

It may well be that ordinarily a foster relationship does not begin until natural parental ties, realistically viewed, are severed; if so, the foster parent bears the parental relationship when the natural parent has ceased to be such in truth and fact. And in that case, the clear intent of the 1942 amendments would demand the exclusion of the natural parent from participation in the proceeds.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature