Ward Hunt, Wilson v. Boyce — Opinion of the Court
“ A mortgage 'of all my property,' like the one we are considering, is sufficient to transfer title.2. It was quite within the competency of the railroad company to mortgage its lands not used for its track or appurtenances. It might be deemed prudent and judicious to raise money upon its collateral property rather than upon its road. It might lose its foreign lands, and still be successful as a railroad company. If it should lose its track, it must at once cease to exist.3. In the first mortgage, the State took its security upon the road and its appurtenances. ”
