Summary

Wiley Blount Rutledge,  Memphis Natural Gas Company v. Stone…

“ They do not lose that character merely because an apportioned tax may be levied upon the gross receipts from them. The incidence of that tax is flatly on the commerce, though only on the local portion of it. So here I do not think that the local activities for the protection of which the Mississippi tax purports in terms to be laid become separate from the interstate business which petitioner conducts in Mississippi, either by reason of the apportionment or otherwise. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature