Summary

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Mining Company v. Cullins — Opinion of the Court

It is somewhat difficult to draw the line between the kind of work and labor which is entitled to a lien, and that which is mere professional or supervisory employment, not fairly to be included in those terms. Some courts have held, under laws similar to those of Utah, that an architect who furnishes plans and superintends the erection of a building acquires a lien thereon as for work and labor.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Mining Company v. Cullins — Opinion of the Court

They cannot be performed without much physicla exertion, which, while not so severs as that demanded of the workmen under his control, is nevertheless as really work and labor. Bodily toil, as well as some skill and knowledge in directing the work, is required for their successful performance. We think that the discharge of them may well be called work and labor, and that the District Court rightfully declared the person who performed them entitled to a lien under the law of the Territory.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature