Summary

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Alejandrino v. Quezon — Opinion of the Court

Equally so is the still more important question whether the Supreme Court of the Philippines had any jurisdiction by extraordinary writ of mandamus or injunction to require the Senate, a part of the Island Legislature, and a separate branch of the government, to rescind its resolution and to readmit Alejandrino to the Senate as an active member.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Alejandrino v. Quezon — Opinion of the Court

We must assume, in view of the injunction of Congress in the Autonomy Act, that Senators shall receive an annual compensation to be fixed by law, that there is some official or board charged with the executive and ministerial duty of paying the senatorial salaries against whom a Senator entitled might procure a mandamus to compel payment. But the averments of the petition do not set out with sufficient clearness who that official or set of officials may be.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Alejandrino v. Quezon — Opinion of the Court

We think, now that the main question as to the validity of the suspension has become moot, the incidental issue as to the remedy which the suspended Senator may have in recovery of his emoluments if illegally withheld, should properly be tried in a separate proceeding against an executive officer or officers as described. As we are not able to derive from the petition sufficient information upon which properly to afford such a remedy, we must treat the whole cause as moot and act accordingly.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature