Summary

Portrait of Carl Schurz Carl Schurz Harper's Weekly Editorials by Carl Schurz…

It is evident, therefore, that the practice which gives the Senators any part in the selection of persons for nomination is grossly repugnant to the spirit and intent of the Constitution. When the President permits Senators to control in any sense, positively or negatively, nominations before they are submitted to the whole Senate he violates his constitutional duty and evades his constitutional responsibility.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Carl Schurz Carl Schurz Harper's Weekly Editorials by Carl Schurz…

Wellington should not claim his right to equal treatment. That a consistent adherence to such a method of making nominations may lead an administration into pitiable dilemmas is certainly true. But that is a thing which should have been considered before the method was adopted.
Is it not time that the President and Senators and the American people generally should once more remember what under the Constitution the power and the duties of the President and of the members of the Senate really are?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Carl Schurz Carl Schurz Harper's Weekly Editorials by Carl Schurz…

The Constitution demands that the President shall select the persons to be nominated according to his own judgment and upon his own responsibility; and that responsibility is as great as if the nomination were equivalent to a completed appointment. Nor can he share this responsibility in making nominations with the Senators; for their responsibility as members of the Senate begins only when the nominations are submitted, not to Senators individually, but to the Senate as a body, for approval.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature