Summary

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Oriel v. Russell Prela — Opinion of the Court

There is a possibility, of course, of error and hardship, but the conscience of judges in weighing the evidence under a clear perception of the consequences, together with the opportunity of appeal and review, if properly taken, will restrain the courts from recklessness of bankrupt's rights on the one hand and prevent the bankrupt from flouting the law on the other.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Oriel v. Russell Prela — Opinion of the Court

The Court ought not to issue an order lightly or merely on a preponderance of the evidence, but only after full deliberation and satisfactory evidence, with the understanding that it is rendering a judgment which is only to be set aside on appeal or some other form of review, or upon a properly supported petition for rehearing in the same court.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Oriel v. Russell Prela — Opinion of the Court

We think a proceeding for a turnover order in bankruptcy is one the right to which should be supported by clear and convincing evidence. The charge upon which the order is asked is that the bankrupt, having possession of property which he knew should have been delivered by him to the trustees, refuses to comply with his obligation in this regard.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature