Summary

William J. Brennan, Jr. Fortson v. Dorsey — Opinion of the Court

It is not accurate to treat a senator from a multi-district county as the representative of only that district within the county wherein he resides. The statute uses districts in multi-district counties merely as the basis of residence for candidates, not for voting or representation. Each district's senator must be a resident of that district, but since has tenure depends upon the county-wide electorate he must be vigilant to serve the interests of all the people in the county, and not merely those of people in his home district
Source: Wikisource

William J. Brennan, Jr. Fortson v. Dorsey — Opinion of the Court

It is not contended that there is not 'substantial equality of population' among the 54 senatorial districts. The equal protection argument is focused solely upon the question whether county-wide voting in the seven multidistrict counties results in denying the residents therein a vote 'approximately equal in weight to that of' voters resident in the single-member constituencies.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature