William O. Douglas,
Eli Lilly and Company v. Sav-on-Drugs…
“ Yet today the Court finds these activities to be separable from appellant's interstate business; appellant is 'inducing' sales, not 'soliciting' them. It is not a distinction I can accept.We deal here with a general state regulatory measure. Under our precedents, access to state courts cannot be barred to 'a foreign corporation merely coming into (the State) to contribute to or to conclude a unitary interstate transaction.' Union Brokerage Co. v. Jensen, 322 U.S. 202, 211, 64 S.Ct. 967, 973. Yet that is what New Jersey claims the power to do. ”
