Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Guggenheim v. Rasquin — Opinion of the Court

But the owner of a fully paid life insurance policy has more than the mere right to surrender it; he has the right to retain it for its investment vitues and to receive the face amount of the policy upon the insured's death. That these latter rights are deemed by purchasers of insurance to have substantial value is clear from the difference between the cost of a single-premium policy and its immediate or early cash-surrender value-in the instant case over $135,000. All of the economic benefits of a policy must be taken into consideration in determining its value for gift-tax purposes.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Guggenheim v. Rasquin — Opinion of the Court

If the policy is surrendered, the company will pay the cash-surrender value. It is asserted that the market for insurance contracts is usually he issuing companies or the banks who will lend money on them; that banks will not loan more than the cash-surrender value; and that if policies had an actual realizable value in excess of their cash-surrender value, there would arise a business of purchasing such policies from those who otherwise would surrender them.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature