Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Hirabayashi v. United States — Concurrence

Since we cannot override the military judgment which lay behind these orders, it seems to me necessary to concede that the army had the power to deal temporarily with these people on a group basis. Petitioner therefore was not justified in disobeying the orders.
But I think it important to emphasize that we are dealing here with a problem of loyalty not assimilation. Loyalty is a matter of mind and of heart not of race. That indeed is the history of America. Moreover, guilt is personal under our constitutional system. Detention for reasonable cause is one thing.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Hirabayashi v. United States — Concurrence

But if it were plain that no machinery was available whereby the individual could demonstrate his loyalty as a citizen in order to be reclassified, questions of a more serious character would be presented. The United States, however, takes no such position. We need go no further here than to deny the individual the right to defy the law.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature