Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Piemonte v. United States — Dissent

Whatever the criminal charge may be, an accused is entitled to the protections afforded by the Constitution-indictment by a grand jury and trial before a petit jury which sits to determine guilt. Determination of guilt by a judge, without these safeguards interposed between the accused and government, marks a continuing erosion of civil rights.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Piemonte v. United States — Dissent

The evil is compounded here by reason of the fact that contempt is used to increase a punishment already imposed for an offense as respects which no second indictment could ever be returned. Criminal contempt is used to undermine not only the guarantees of an indictment by a grand jury and a trial by one's peers but also to destroy the protection of double jeopardy.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Piemonte v. United States — Dissent

There is no power in our free society to compel a person to talk about a matter on which he has been indicted or to penalize him for failure to do so. We might as well say that an accused can be committed for contempt for failure to take the stand at his own trial.
We are advised that after we granted certiorari the indictment against petitioner was dismissed on motion of the Government for lack of evidence. That seems irrelevant. The truth is that the grand jury before which petitioner was summoned did indict him.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature