Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Priebe Sons v. United States — Dissent

And in no other act of Congress is there a suggestion that liquidated damage provisions in other Government contracts are unenforceable because the courts believe no actual damages could be sustained from a breach. Yet the majority adopts such a principle today to invalidate a clause in this contract, and thereby, as I see it, embarks upon the very undesirable practice of supervising and revising the congressionally authorized conduct of federal contracting agents.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Priebe Sons v. United States — Dissent

In such situations society makes individuals the representatives of the public for the purpose of enforcing a policy explicitly formulated by legislation. The essence of the law's remedy for breach of contract is that he who has suffered from a breach should be duly compensated for the loss incurred by non-performance. But one man's default should not lead to another man's unjust enrichment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature