Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Reetz v. Bozanich — Opinion of the Court

The three-judge panel was a distinguished one, two being former Alaska lawyers. And they felt that prompt decision was necessary to avoid the 'grave and irreparable' injury to the 'economic livelihood' of the appellees which would result, if they could not engage in their occupation 'during this year's forthcoming fishing season.' Ibid.
It is, of course, true that abstention is not necessary whenever a federal court is faced with a question of local law, the classic case being Meredith v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature