Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Shade v. Downing — Opinion of the Court

The heirship proceeding involves only 'a determination of the question of fact as to who are the heirs of any deceased citizen allottee of the Five Civilized Tribes.' [5] As such, it is little more than an identification of those who by law are entitled to the lands in question and does not directly affect the restrictions on the land or the land itself. Important as these proceedings may be to the stability of Indian Land titles, [6] they are of primary interest only to the immediate parties. The United States is, indeed, hardly more than a stakeholder in the litigation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Shade v. Downing — Opinion of the Court

Hellard, supra, that the United States was a necessary party to the partition proceedings, even absent a statutory requirement to that effect.
Heirship proceedings, however, present quite different considerations. They involve no governmental interests of the dignity of those involved in partition proceedings. Restrictions on alienation do not prevent inheritance.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature