Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Whitney v. Florida — Dissent

Far more than mere trial tactics and strategy is involved. In such a case the denial of the defendant's rights is not cured by outstanding representation by counsel during the balance of proceedings. It is no answer for the Florida courts to say counsel never moved at trial for a transfer to a county not saturated with pretrial publicity; for this failure of counsel is the very heart of the wrong allegedly done to petitioner.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Whitney v. Florida — Dissent

In his application petitioner alleged that extensive pretrial publicity-including television broadcasts of confessions given by him-prevented selection of a fair and impartial jury. Petitioner further alleged that he asked his trial counsel to request a change of venue, but counsel refused to do so. The Florida District Court of Appeal held that no evidentiary hearing was necessary because venue objections could only be raised at trial and because venue was res judicata under the judgment in a prior collateral attack by petitioner (see Whitney v. Cochran, 152 So.2d 727, 730 (Fla.)
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature