Summary

William Strong Bullard v. Bank — Opinion of the Court

The articles of association required by that section to be entered into must specify in general terms the object for which the association is formed, and may contain any other provisions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the act, which the association may see fit to adopt for the regulation of its business and the conduct of its affairs. To us it seems that a by-law giving to the bank a lien upon its stock, as against indebted stockholders, ought not to be considered as a regulation of the business of the bank or a regulation for the conduct of its affairs.
Source: Wikisource

William Strong Bullard v. Bank — Opinion of the Court

The policy on the subject was changed, and the directors of banking associations were, in effect, notified that thereafter they must deal with their shareholders as they dealt with other people. As the restrictions fell so did that part of the by-law relating to the subject fall with them.' But this could have been only because the restriction was regarded as inconsistent with the policy and spirit of the act of 1864.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature