Wolfsohn v. Hankin — Opinion of the Court
“ Mr. Justice CLARK, whom Mr. Justice HARLAN, Mr. Justice STEWART and Mr. Justice WHITE join, dissenting.I have concluded that Harris Truck Lines v. Cherry Meat Packers, 371 U.S. 215, 83 S.Ct. 283 (1962) , should be confined to its peculiar facts, i. e., a finding of 'excusable neglect' under Rule 73 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I say this, although I joined Harris, because the Court has used Harris to spawn the present hopeless confusion which I never contemplated at the time of its decision. Harris was the authority upon which the Court rested Thompson v. ”
