“ Our decision to deny a petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis is based on our review of the information contained in the supporting affidavit of indigency. [3] In petitioner's case, a review of the affidavits he has filed with his last nine petitions for certiorari indicates that his financial condition has remained substantially unchanged. [4] The Court denied him leave to proceed in forma pauperis with respect to each petition. Petitioner has nonetheless continued to file for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ”

“ Commissioner, 486 U.S. 1041, 108 S.Ct. 2032, 100 L.Ed.2d 617 (1988) ($1,073 per month in salary; $14,496 per year in retirement benefits; $42 in cash; $72,000 home; 4 dependents) ; Wrenn v. Gould, 484 U.S. 961, 108 S.Ct. 448, 98 L.Ed.2d 389 (1987) ($1,073 per month in salary; $8,400 per year in retirement benefits; $61 in cash; $72,000 home; 4 dependents) ”