Summary

by John Marshall Harlan Knoxville Water Company v. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Knoxville…

On the other hand, the city may, with much reason, say that, having once thought of having its own waterworks, the failure to insert in that agreement a provision precluding it, in all circumstances, and during a long period, from having its own separate system, shows that it was not its purpose to so restrict the exercise of its powers, but to remain absolutely free to act as changed circumstances or the public exigencies might demand.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Knoxville Water Company v. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Knoxville…

It is, we think, important that the courts should adhere firmly to the salutary doctrine underlying the whole law of municipal corporations and the doctrines of the adjudged cases, that grants of special privileges affecting the general interests are to be liberally construed in favor of the public, and that no public body, charged with public duties, be held, upon mere implication or presumption, to have devested itself of its powers.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Knoxville Water Company v. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Knoxville…

Turning, now, to the agreement of 1882, we fail to find in it any words necessarily importing an obligation on the part of the city not to establish and maintain waterworks of its own during the term of the water company. It is said that the company could not possibly have believed that the city would establish waterworks to be operated in competition with its system, for such competition would be ruinous to the water company, as its projectors, on a moment's reflection, could have perceived when the agreement of 1882 was made.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature