Summary

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Jones (121 U.S. 89…

We may properly take judicial notice of the fact that many claims against the United States cannot be enforced by suit, but provision for which may, and upon grounds of equity and justice ought to be, made by special legislation. But the discretion which congress has in such matters would be very seriously trammeled if the doctrine should be established that it cannot appropriate money to pay particular claims, except at the risk of thereby recognizing the legal liability of the United States for the amount of other claims of the same general class.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Jones (121 U.S. 89…

That the policy pursued by Wozencraft and his colleagues was the only one that would have given peace to the inhabitants of California; that the Indians were induced by the promises of subsistence held out to them to abandon their lands to the whites, and settle upon reservations selected for them; and that the United States thereby acquired title to the lands so abandoned,-are considerations to be addressed to congress in support of a special appropriation to pay the claim of McDougall's administrator.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature