Summary

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Stanford — Opinion of the Court

If, instead of making use of the Central Pacific Railroad Company of California, congress had itself created a corporation, with authority to construct a road from San Francisco, through the territories of the United States, to meet the Union Pacific Railroad Company, no one would suggest that the stockholders of such a corporation would have been liable for its debts, unless congress expressly imposed liability upon them.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Stanford — Opinion of the Court

In respect of the liability of stockholders to the United States, on account of its subsidy bonds, we cannot believe that congress intended to apply to the stockholders of the state corporation, selected to participate in the great work of establishing railroad and telegraphic communication between the Missouri river and the Pacific Ocean, any rule that it did not prescribe for stockholders of a national corporation created for the purpose of accomplishing the same object.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature