Summary

by John Marshall Meigs v. M'Clung's Lessee — Opinion of the Court

The facts, that the agents of the United States took possession of this land lying above the mouth of the Highwassee, erected expensive buildings thereon, and placed a garrison there, cannot be admitted to give an explanation to the treaty, which would contradict its plain words and obvious meaning. The land is certainly the property of the Plaintiff below; and the United States cannot have intended to deprive him of it by violence, and without compensation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature