Summary

by V.F. Kirilov, A.V. Chirkin On individual means for respiratory organs protection against dust

With increased individual sensitivity of a worker, the individual features of his face (preventing to ensure a tight fit of the mask) , or at the request of the employee, the employer is obliged to provide the worker respirator that provides a higher degree of protection than is dictated by the concentration of dust (instead of half-mask respirator - full facepiece mask, and instead of a full facepiece mask – respiratorwith forced air supply) .
Source: Wikisource

by V.F. Kirilov, A.V. Chirkin On individual means for respiratory organs protection against dust

It is important to emphasize that in the conditions of the possible impact of harmful factors on workers use personal respiratory protection (RPE) , the use of which in such circumstances dictated by a number of sanitary and legislative documents. In reality, the employer is obliged to fulfill their requirements. However, despite the use of respiratory protective equipment at the workplace with a high dust content, the diagnosis of "pneumoconiosis" and "occupational bronchitis" - are not uncommon.
Source: Wikisource

by V.F. Kirilov, A.V. Chirkin On individual means for respiratory organs protection against dust

In 1987, [17] researchers Donald Campbell and Steven Lenhart conducted a statistical analysis of measurements of protective properties of respirators in the workplace, and proposed to limit the use of a respirator mask with a certain type so that 95% of all cases of their application (with the right choice? donning and wearing) the degree of protection in the workplace was higher than the dust content (in the PEL) . For example, if one use data from the example above [15] , one find that for dust concentration 753 PEL sufficient degree of protection will be only in 1 of 49 cases (about 2%) .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature