Summary

by V.F. Kirilov, A.V. Chirkin,  On individual means for respiratory organs protection against dust

“ With increased individual sensitivity of a worker, the individual features of his face (preventing to ensure a tight fit of the mask) , or at the request of the employee, the employer is obliged to provide the worker respirator that provides a higher degree of protection than is dictated by the concentration of dust (instead of half-mask respirator - full facepiece mask, and instead of a full facepiece mask – respiratorwith forced air supply) . ”
Source: Wikisource

by V.F. Kirilov, A.V. Chirkin,  On individual means for respiratory organs protection against dust

“ It is important to emphasize that in the conditions of the possible impact of harmful factors on workers use personal respiratory protection (RPE) , the use of which in such circumstances dictated by a number of sanitary and legislative documents. In reality, the employer is obliged to fulfill their requirements. However, despite the use of respiratory protective equipment at the workplace with a high dust content, the diagnosis of "pneumoconiosis" and "occupational bronchitis" - are not uncommon. ”
Source: Wikisource

by V.F. Kirilov, A.V. Chirkin,  On individual means for respiratory organs protection against dust

“ In 1987, [17] researchers Donald Campbell and Steven Lenhart conducted a statistical analysis of measurements of protective properties of respirators in the workplace, and proposed to limit the use of a respirator mask with a certain type so that 95% of all cases of their application (with the right choice? donning and wearing) the degree of protection in the workplace was higher than the dust content (in the PEL) . For example, if one use data from the example above [15] , one find that for dust concentration 753 PEL sufficient degree of protection will be only in 1 of 49 cases (about 2%) . ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature