by the Supreme Court of Korea

Summary

by the Supreme Court of Korea Supreme Court Decision 2004Do7027 Delivered on November 9… (2006 | noyear)

If the asset of the company that is taken over is made to be provided as collateral without any compensation, it is fair to deem that the person that takes over the company or a third party gained property profit that is equivalent of the value of the collateral and that the company that is taken over bears damages to its property.
Source: Wikisource

by the Supreme Court of Korea Supreme Court Decision 2004Do7027 Delivered on November 9… (2006 | noyear)

For the intention of the crime of malfeasance in office to be recognized, the person who deals with other person's work shall have an intention to do property damage, an intention to give himself or a third party property benefit, and is aware that his act violates his duties, so even if the defendant has an intention to work for his own interest, it shall only be deemed to be secondary, and if the intention for benefit or damage turns out to be the main intention, an intention of the crime of malfeasance in office shall be deemed to exist.
Source: Wikisource

by the Supreme Court of Korea Supreme Court Decision 2004Do7027 Delivered on November 9… (2006 | noyear)

For a director of a company to lend company fund to another person, if he did it while knowing that the other person has already lost his ability to pay off loans so lending him money would cause damage to the company, or if he did it while not taking reasonable measures such as getting sufficient collaterals provided, such loans constitute malfeasance in office against the company as it is an act of letting the other person gain profit and causing damage to the company (refer to Supreme Court Decision 99Do4923 delivered on March 14, 2000 et al.)
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature