Summary

| no_author LOHICCA SUTTA — Sutta 12 of the Digha Nikaya

Such a teacher may be rebuked, setting out these facts, and adding: “You are like a man who, having broken through an old bond, should entangle himself in a new one. Like that, do I say, is this lust of yours (to go on teaching when you have not trained yourself to teach) . For what, then, can one man do for another?”
‘This, Lohicca, is the third sort of teacher in the world worthy of blame. And whosoever should blame such a one, his rebuke would be justified, in accord with the facts and the truth, not improper.
Source: Wikisource

| no_author LOHICCA SUTTA — Sutta 12 of the Digha Nikaya

But putting obstacles in their way he would be out of sympathy for their welfare; being out of sympathy for their welfare his heart would become established in enmity; and when one’s heart is established in enmity, that is unsound doctrine. Now if a man hold unsound doctrine, Lohicca, I declare that one of two future births will be his lot, either purgatory or rebirth as an animal.
Source: Wikisource

| no_author LOHICCA SUTTA — Sutta 12 of the Digha Nikaya

God himself has bestowed the exclusive right of teaching upon the hereditary priests; [2] who indeed claim to be, each of them, great divinities, [3] even to the gods. [4] And it would be a danger to social order if they taught women, or any males not twice-born, or any twice-born males who would not share their views as to the ethics of teaching, and as to the privileges and prerogatives of the priest as teacher.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature