Court of First Instance of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

Biographical details

Court of First Instance of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region HKSAR v Tong Ying Kit/Reasons for Verdict (2021)

In our view, a blatant and serious challenge mounted against the police force which is charged with the responsibility of maintaining public safety and security, and thus a symbol of law and order, will certainly instill a sense of fear amongst the law-abiding members of the public, in particular, apprehension of a breakdown of a safe and peaceful society into a lawless one.
Source: Wikisource

Court of First Instance of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region HKSAR v Tong Ying Kit/Reasons for Verdict (2021)

For an offence under Article 24, as explained in our ruling given orally on 29 April 2021, we are of the view that “causing or intended to cause grave harm to the society” is an element which the Prosecution is required to prove. In other words, the actus reus of the offence is the organization, planning, commission, participation in, or threatening to commit any of the activities specified under Article 24 (1) to 24 (5) and which causes grave harm to the society or which is intended by the defendant to cause such harm.
Source: Wikisource

Court of First Instance of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region HKSAR v Tong Ying Kit/Reasons for Sentence (2021)

The date of 1 July 2020 was of particular importance as it was the first day of implementation of the NSL, a law which was promulgated in light of the “increasingly notable national security risks in the HKSAR . . . [in] particular, since the onset of Hong Kong’s ‘legislative amendment turmoil’ in 2019, anti-China forces seeking to disrupt Hong Kong have blatantly advocated such notions as ‘Hong Kong independence’, ‘self-determination’ and ‘referendum’, and engaged in activities to undermine national unity and split the country” [5] .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature