Donald L. Corbin

Biographical details

Donald L. Corbin,  McQuay v. Guntharp (1998)

“ To establish an outrage claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate the following elements: (1) the actor intended to inflict emotional distress or knew or should have known that emotional distress was the likely result of his conduct; (2) the conduct was "extreme and outrageous," was "beyond all possible bounds of decency," and was "utterly intolerable in a civilized community"; (3) the actions of the defendant were the cause of the plaintiff's distress; and (4) the emotional distress sustained by the plaintiff was so severe that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it. ”
Source: Wikisource

Donald L. Corbin,  Jackson v. State (2013)

“ In reviewing a circuit court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we conduct a de novo review based on the totality of the circumstances, reviewing findings of historical facts for clear error and determining whether those facts give rise to reasonable suspicion or probable cause, giving due weight to inferences drawn by the circuit court and proper deference to the circuit court's findings. ”
Source: Wikisource

Donald L. Corbin,  McQuay v. Guntharp (1998)

“ The foregoing facts sufficiently state a claim for outrage. The trial court thus erred in characterizing the cause of action as constituting the tort of battery.
[11] The nature of the physician-patient relationship and the nature of the allegations presented by Appellants create the appropriateness of a suit for tort of outrage. A patient entrusts his or her body and sense of dignity to a physician. The patient subjects himself or herself to a loss of this dignity and a loss of privacy by even divulging his or her personal thoughts as to what ails him or her.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature