Henry H. Kennedy, JR.United States District Judge

“ A motion for summary judgment should be granted if the moving party demonstrates, when the facts are viewed in the light most favorable to the opponent, that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ”

“ Even when a declaration describes the details of an extensive search, Plaintiff insists that the agency has responsive records that it is hiding from her in bad faith, often pursuant to the alleged German Nazi conspiracy. ”

“ Certain offices of the Department of Justice employed a "Glomar" response in connection with Exemption 7 (C) to decline to admit or deny the existence of documents responsive to Plaintiff's requests. [9] The courts have, however, upheld the use of the "Glomar" response in connection with a request for law enforcement records of a third party. See, e.g., Enzinna v. United States Dep't of Justice, No. 97-5078, 1997 WL 404327, at *2 (D.C. Cir. 1997) ; Beck, 997 F.2d at 1494. Plaintiff does not have consent to disclosure from any of the third parties. ”

“ The information that may be disclosed is only that which is "maintained by an agency" (Section 552a (a) (4) ) in a system of records, that is, "a group of any records . . . from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual." Section 552a (a) (5) . Of special relevance to Plaintiff's request for information regarding individuals other than herself is the firm prohibition against disclosure "to any person . ”

“ Accordingly, Plaintiff is not entitled to release under the Privacy Act of information regarding Mark Rathbun or any of the other individuals about whom she has sought information.
Offices within the White House whose functions are limited to advising and assisting the President do not come within the definition of an "agency" within the meaning of FOIA or the Privacy Act. ”

“ To reiterate Plaintiff seeks documents regarding persons other than herself, including Mark Rathbun, but has not provided consents from those individuals. With respect to her document requests regarding Rathbun, Plaintiff contends that compelling circumstances affecting the health and safety of Rathbun bring her requests within the "health and safety" exception to the prohibition against disclosure of documents concerning persons other than the requester. The court disagrees. ”

“ Plaintiff's numerous FOIA requests of each defendant entity were slightly different. In many instances Plaintiff asked for all requests for information regarding herself made by or on behalf of Mark Rathbun or an Independent or Special Counsel. ”

“ The requirement for detailed declarations and Vaughn [6] indices is imposed in connection with a motion for summary judgment filed by a defendant in a civil action pending in court. See, e.g., Weisbergv. ”