Summary

Portrait of Abe Fortas Abe Fortas Joint Industry Board of Electrical Industry v…

For the majority indulges in a major, unexplained, assumption with which I do not agree: the majority assumes, without any basis that I can find in the record or anywhere else, that upon the bankruptcy of an employer an employee is likely to suffer the hardship of unemployment yet unlikely to suffer the hardship of accepting a job outside the electrical industry or with an employer who is not covered by the collective bargaining contract and annuity plan.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Abe Fortas Abe Fortas Joint Industry Board of Electrical Industry v…

An employee was never entitled to demand and receive payment of sums that he had earned. These sums were not credited to him to be paid upon his death or retirement or other contingencies.
In a dissenting opinion in that case, Mr. Justice Black (joined by The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas) argued that the majority misconceived the nature of the payments into the fund in Embassy Restaurant and the purpose of the priority for wages.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature