Summary

Portrait of Anthony Kennedy Anthony Kennedy United Steelworkers of America v…

Although we have inferred that Congress intended to impose a duty of fair representation in § 9 (a) , I see no justification for the further conclusion that Congress desired to grant unions an immunity from all state tort law. Nothing about a union's status as the exclusive representative of a bargaining unit creates a need to exempt it from general duties to exercise due care to avoid injuring others.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Anthony Kennedy Anthony Kennedy United Steelworkers of America v…

We must have the ultimate responsibility for deciding whether a state law depends on a collective-bargaining agreement for the purposes of § 301. In this case, however, I see no indication that the tort theory pressed by the respondents has the limited application presumed by the Court.
The Idaho Supreme Court did not invent, for the purposes of this case, the theory underlying the respondents' claims. As Cardozo put it: "It is ancient learning that one who assumes to act, even though gratuitously, may thereby become subject to the duty of acting carefully, if he acts at all."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Anthony Kennedy Anthony Kennedy United Steelworkers of America v…

It is a principle of general application that the exercise of a granted power to act in behalf of others involves the assumption toward them of a duty to exercise the power in their interest and behalf, and that such a grant of power will not be deemed to dispense with all duty toward those from whom it is exercised unless so expressed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature