Summary

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Groves v. Ring Screw Works, Ferndale Fastener Division…

The execution of an agreement does not by itself promote industrial peace. The chief advantage which an employer can reasonably expect from a collective labor agreement is assurance of uninterrupted operation during the term of the agreement. Without some effective method of assuring freedom from economic warfare for the term of the agreement, there is little reason why an employer would desire to sign such a contract.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Groves v. Ring Screw Works, Ferndale Fastener Division…

Of course, the parties may expressly agree to resort to economic warfare rather than to mediation, arbitration, or judicial review, but the statute surely does not favor such an agreement. For in most situations a strike or a lockout, though it may be a method of ending the impasse, is not a method of resolving the merits of the dispute over the application or meaning of the contract.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Groves v. Ring Screw Works, Ferndale Fastener Division…

We believe that the CBAs in question do bring about an inference that a strike, or other job action, is the perceived remedy for failure of successful resolution of a grievance absent agreed arbitration. Such resolution, by work 'stoppage or other interference' is not a happy solution from a societal standpoint of an industrial dispute, particularly as it relates to the claim of a single employee that he has been wrongfully discharged.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature