Summary

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia Bush v. Gore — Certiorari - Concurrence of Justice Scalia

The counting of votes that are of questionable legality does in my view threaten irreparable harm to petitioner Bush, and to the country, by casting a cloud upon what he claims to be the legitimacy of his election. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic stability requires.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia Bush v. Gore — Certiorari - Concurrence of Justice Scalia

If petitioners are correct that counting in this fashion is unlawful, permitting the count to proceed on that erroneous basis will prevent an accurate recount from being conducted on a proper basis later, since it is generally agreed that each manual recount produces a degradation of the ballots, which renders a subsequent recount inaccurate.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature