Summary

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia John Doe v. John Doe — Dissenting Opinion

Secondly, the regime that the Court's interpretation establishes lends itself to abuse so readily that it is unlikely to have been intended. The only other documents I am aware of that can go from being available under FOIA to being unavailable, simply on the basis of an agency's own action, are records containing national defense or foreign policy information. Exemption 1 is inapplicable to records of that description that have not been classified, but it can be rendered applicable, even after the FOIA request has been filed, by the mere act of classification.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia John Doe v. John Doe — Dissenting Opinion

The Court's only response is that " [e] vasional commingling . . . would be prevented" by the requirement that a document cannot be withheld under Exemption 7 unless, if disclosed, it "would effectuate one or more of the six specified harms." Ante, at 156-157. But that begs the question. Congress did not extend protection to all documents that produced one of the six specified harms, but only to such documents "compiled for law enforcement purposes."
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature