Summary

Archelaus Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Acts of Disputation… (1885)

You, however, who allege that the law of Moses comes from the prince of evil, and not from the good God, tell me who those were who withstood Moses to the face—I mean Jamnes and Mambres? [7] For, every object that withstands, withstands not itself, but some other one, either better or worse; as Paul also gives us to understand when he writes in the following terms in his second Epistle to Timothy: “As Jamnes and Mambres withstood Moses, so have these also resisted the truth: men of corrupt mind, reprobate concerning the faith.
Source: Wikisource

Archelaus Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Acts of Disputation… (1885)

But they shall proceed no further: for their folly is manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.” [8] Do you observe how he compares Jamnes and Mambres to men of corrupt mind, and reprobate concerning the faith; while he likens Moses, on the other hand, to the truth? But the holy John, the greatest of the evangelists, also tells us of the giving and diffusing of grace for grace; [9] for he indicates, indeed, that we have received the law of Moses out of the fulness of Christ, and he means that for that one grace this other grace has been made perfect in us through Jesus Christ.
Source: Wikisource

Archelaus Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Acts of Disputation… (1885)

Discovering also more arguments for himself he was able to bring forward many points of great pertinency and power against the man, and in defence of the truth. He also reasoned in a conclusive manner against his opponent on verbal grounds. [2] For example, he argued with him in the following manner:—Did you say that the testaments are two? Well, then, say either that there are two old testaments, or that there are two new testaments.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature