Summary

Portrait of Arthur Drews Arthur Drews The Witnesses to the Historicity of Jesus… (1912)

According to Weiss, therefore, the silence of Josephus is “no sign of hatred of the Christians, but rather the reverse. An enemy of the Christians would certainly have drawn attention to them in order to relieve Judaism of the charge of having anything to do with the sect.” “His silence is all the more puzzling” (p. 90) . May not the simple explanation be that in the time of Josephus the Christians did not differ sufficiently from official Judaism to require special mention?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Drews Arthur Drews The Witnesses to the Historicity of Jesus… (1912)

It would not be very easy to show that Jesus and his affairs would seem “insignificant” to Josephus in writing the history of the Jews, and that the sect brought into existence by him would seem unworthy of mention. At that time the Christian movement is supposed to have reached a prominent place in public life and attracted general attention.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature