Byron White, Schad v. Arizona — Dissenting Opinion
“ It is particularly fanciful to equate an intent to do no more than rob with a premeditated intent to murder.Consequently, a verdict that simply pronounces a defendant "guilty of first-degree murder" provides no clues as to whether the jury agrees that the three elements of premeditated murder or the two elements of felony murder have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Instead, it is entirely possible that half of the jury believed the defendant was guilty of premeditated murder and not guilty of felony murder/robbery, while half believed exactly the reverse. ”
