Summary

Byron White United States v. O'Malley — Opinion of the Court

With respect to each addition to trust principal from accumulated income, Fabrice had clearly made a 'transfer' as required by § 811 (c) (1) (B) (ii) . Under that section, the power over income retained by Fabrice is sufficient to require the inclusion of the original corpus of the trust in his gross estate. The accumulated income added to principal is subject to the same power and is likewise includable.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White United States v. O'Malley — Opinion of the Court

Respondents rely upon two cases in which the Tax Court and two circuit courts of appeals have concluded that where an irrevocable inter vivos transfer in trust, not incomplete in any respect, is subjected to tax as a gift in contemplation of death under § 811 (c) , the income of the trust accumulated prior to the grantor's death is not includable in the gross estate.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White United States v. O'Malley — Opinion of the Court

All income increments to trust principal are therefore traceable to Fabrice himself, by virtue of the original transfer and the exercise of the power to accumulate. Before the creation of the trusts, Fabrice owned all rights to the property and to its income. By the time of his death he had divested himself of all power and control over accumulated income which had been added to the principal, except the power to deal with the income from such additions.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature