Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Ryerson v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Thus all those who might become entitled to the use and enjoyment of the trust, principal and income, were ascertainable only upon the happening of one or more uncertain future events, survivorship of one or more persons at the death of the donor, and so they were donees of gifts of 'future interests' within the meaning of § 504 (b) and the treasury regulations. Consequently petitioners are not entitled to the single exclusion which the court below allowed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Ryerson v. United States — Opinion of the Court

If the widow of the grantor's son survived the grantor the income of one-third of the proceeds of the insurance policy was to be paid to the son's widow for life with remainders over to those persons who would be heirs at law of the son had he died at the same time as the life tenant. The remaining two-thirds of the proceeds or all if the son's widow did not survive the grantor, were to go to the descendants of the grantor's son then surviving, with gifts over in default of such descendants.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature